Does Otter.ai also facilitate the meeting or ask questions?

No — Otter's bot transcribes, and its AI Chat feature lets you ask questions about the transcript during or after the meeting, but the bot itself does not interject to ask the room a clarifying question (otter.ai/pricing). Ava's facilitator personas do, live, as a named participant.

Is Otter.ai cheaper than Ava?

For a large team of light users, often yes — Otter's Pro tier starts at $16.99/user/month, or $8.33/user/month billed annually (otter.ai/pricing, fetched 2026-09-13), which can undercut Ava's flat $39/month plan once you're paying for many seats. For a single user or small team with long meetings, Ava's flat, uncapped-per-call plan often works out better, since Otter's Pro tier caps each conversation at 90 minutes.

Which meeting platforms does each one support?

Otter supports Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet (otter.ai/pricing). Ava supports Microsoft Teams and Zoom only, joining as an external guest with no tenant install or admin consent required.

Comparison

Ava vs Otter.ai

The short version

Otter.ai is a well-known transcription-first tool: a generous free tier, per-user minute pools that scale up by plan, and an 'AI Chat' feature for querying meetings after the fact. Like most notetakers, its bot records rather than facilitates — it does not ask the room a clarifying question when something is left vague. Ava takes the other approach: a named participant who asks in the moment and writes role-specific documents rather than one general transcript-and-chat experience. Teams that mainly want a searchable transcript archive across many short meetings, at a low per-seat price, are usually better served by Otter; teams where meetings routinely end with something unowned or undecided are the case Ava is built for.

Facts checked September 13, 2026. Pricing and features change — check their current pricing page before deciding.

Start free — no credit card Talk to Ava for 3 minutes

Where the two approaches differ

How each one behaves during the call

Otter.ai: Otter's bot joins to transcribe and offers 'AI Chat within and across meetings' so participants can ask questions about what was said — but only after it was said, and it does not itself interject to ask the room a clarifying question (otter.ai/pricing).
Ava: Ava participates as a named guest who may ask a short clarifying question in the moment when something stays vague or unowned.

Otter's AI Chat is genuinely useful for querying a transcript after the fact. It does not change what gets said during the meeting itself — that gap is what Ava's facilitator personas exist to close.

Pricing model and minute pools

Otter.ai: Otter's Basic (free) tier gives 300 monthly transcription minutes and a 30-minute cap per conversation. Pro is $16.99/user/month (or $8.33/user/month billed annually) for 1,200 minutes/user/month and a 90-minute cap per conversation. Business is $30/user/month (or $19.99/user/month billed annually) for 6,000 minutes/user/month and a 4-hour cap per conversation (otter.ai/pricing, fetched 2026-09-13).
Ava: Ava charges a flat $39/month (or $390/year) per account for a 120 hours pool of meeting time, with no per-conversation length cap and no per-seat multiplier.

For a single long meeting, Otter's Pro tier caps out at 90 minutes per conversation before Business's 4-hour cap is needed — Ava has no such per-call ceiling. For a team of many people having short meetings, Otter's per-seat minute pools can work out cheaper.

What the AI actually does with the transcript

Otter.ai: Otter's differentiator is AI Chat — asking questions about one meeting or across your meeting history — plus (announced, not yet shipped per the pricing page) AI Chat with Gmail, Google Drive, Notion, and Jira, marked 'Coming Soon' (otter.ai/pricing).
Ava: Ava's differentiator is role-specific document generation at the end of the call — a BRD-lite, an impediment log, a MEDDIC scorecard — built from items she captured live, not from a chat interface over the raw transcript.

If what you want is a search-and-ask interface over your meeting history, Otter's AI Chat is built for exactly that. If what you want is a structured first-draft document shaped for the meeting's job, that is Ava's output, not Otter's.

Platform coverage and concurrency

Otter.ai: Otter joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet, with concurrent-meeting limits that scale by plan: 1 concurrent meeting on Basic, 2 on Pro, 3 on Business and Enterprise (otter.ai/pricing).
Ava: Microsoft Teams and Zoom only, joining as an external guest via a pasted link — no tenant install or admin consent, and no stated concurrency cap on how many separate meetings an account can run.

Otter and Ava overlap on Teams and Zoom, so platform coverage is not the deciding factor here the way it can be against other notetakers — Google Meet support is Otter's edge, not a lack of concurrency limits on Ava's side (which are simply not documented either way).

Side by side

Capability	Otter.ai	Ava
Meeting platforms	Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet	Microsoft Teams and Zoom only
Free tier	300 monthly transcription minutes, 30-minute cap per conversation, 1 concurrent meeting	60 minutes within 30 days, no credit card, all personas
Entry-level paid price	$16.99/user/month (Pro), or $8.33/user/month billed annually	$39/month or $390/year, flat — not per seat
Per-conversation length cap	90 minutes (Pro), 4 hours (Business and Enterprise)	No fixed per-meeting cap; the whole call counts toward the plan's 120 hours pool per billing period
Post-meeting AI interface	AI Chat within and across meetings — ask questions of the transcript history	Structured captured items you edit, then generate into a role-specific document
Specialisation	One general assistant across all meeting types	18 purpose-built personas, each with its own capture tools and output documents
Admin and security (Business/Enterprise)	Activity logs, usage analytics, SSO, SCIM, domain capture, HIPAA compliance as an add-on (otter.ai/pricing)	No named enterprise-admin tier at this time
Pricing	Usually per seat per month — check their current pricing page	60 minutes within 30 days, no credit card, all 18 personas. Then $39/month or $390/year · 120 hours per billing period. Video avatar +$149/month.

Pick Otter.ai when

Most of your meetings are on Google Meet, or your team is spread across Zoom, Teams, and Meet and you want one tool covering all three.
You mainly want a searchable transcript archive with a chat interface over your meeting history, not a live-participating agent.
You are rolling this out to a large team of light users, where Otter's per-seat pricing at the entry tiers works out cheaper than a flat plan.
You need SSO, SCIM, or HIPAA-add-on compliance features today — Otter names these on Business/Enterprise; Ava does not yet.

Pick Ava when

You want an agent that asks a clarifying question live, in the room, rather than only answering questions about the transcript afterward.
A single meeting regularly runs long — Ava has no per-conversation length cap the way Otter's Pro tier does at 90 minutes.
You want role-specific output (a BRD-lite, an ADR pack, a MEDDIC scorecard) instead of one general transcript-and-chat experience.
You'd rather pay one flat account price for a pooled block of meeting time than a per-seat fee that scales with headcount.

Where Ava falls short

Worth knowing before you spend the trial on her. None of this is on a roadmap promise — it is how she behaves today:

Microsoft Teams and Zoom only — no Google Meet or Webex support today.
She joins as a visible, named participant, and you are responsible for telling the room she is there.
Facilitator personas speak during the call. For client-sensitive meetings use the silent scribe personas instead.
Artifacts are structured first drafts built from what was said — review and edit them before they go to a client.
Billed by meeting time rather than per seat, so heavy weekly use runs into the plan's time cap.
The on-screen video avatar is a paid add-on (+$149/month) and bills for the whole time it is visible.

Which persona replaces what you have

The comparison changes depending on the meeting. These are the personas most relevant here:

See all 18 personas

Common questions

Does Otter.ai also facilitate the meeting or ask questions?: No — Otter's bot transcribes, and its AI Chat feature lets you ask questions about the transcript during or after the meeting, but the bot itself does not interject to ask the room a clarifying question (otter.ai/pricing). Ava's facilitator personas do, live, as a named participant.
Is Otter.ai cheaper than Ava?: For a large team of light users, often yes — Otter's Pro tier starts at $16.99/user/month, or $8.33/user/month billed annually (otter.ai/pricing, fetched 2026-09-13), which can undercut Ava's flat $39/month plan once you're paying for many seats. For a single user or small team with long meetings, Ava's flat, uncapped-per-call plan often works out better, since Otter's Pro tier caps each conversation at 90 minutes.
Which meeting platforms does each one support?: Otter supports Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet (otter.ai/pricing). Ava supports Microsoft Teams and Zoom only, joining as an external guest with no tenant install or admin consent required.

Try it on a real meeting

60 minutes within 30 days, no credit card, all 18 personas. Paste a Teams or Zoom link into the dashboard, pick a persona, and see what comes back — no tenant install and no admin consent needed.

Start free See pricing